A multi-stakeholder campaign in South Africa to provide a sound legal basis for advance directives such as living wills and the durable power of attorney for healthcare - enabling natural deaths.
Current gaps in legislation
Facilitated conversations about care goals
Compassionate care addressing physical and emotional needs
The Draft National Health Amendment Bill is long overdue. It would provide much-needed legal clarity for advance directives in South Africa, empowering individuals to maintain agency over their illness trajectories when they anticipate losing capacity to make their own medical decisions. This enables individuals to prioritise palliative care when aggressive, curative treatment no longer matches their goals, while ensuring loved ones and health professionals can confidently support and respect their wishes.
Medical professionals face perceived risk of criminal or civil liability when allowing natural deaths by respecting advance directives, creating unnecessary uncertainty.
Advance care planning enables meaningful discussions between patients, families, and healthcare providers about treatment preferences, values, and goals for care during serious illness.
Palliative care provides specialised medical support that focuses on relieving symptoms and improving quality of life, allowing natural death when aggressive treatments no longer align with patient goals.
The bill proposes two types of advance directives that can be freely made by competent individuals.
A signed and attested document that enables a competent person to refuse unwanted life-sustaining treatment, allowing a natural death should they irreversibly lose their capacity to make such decisions. Palliative care and symptom management continue to ensure comfort and dignity.
A signed and attested document that enables a competent person to transfer their healthcare decision-making to a trusted proxy or substitute. Palliative care remains available to maintain quality of life throughout the process.
The Draft Bill is anchored in existing constitutional rights, legal principles, and strong professional ethical guidance.
The right to have one's inherent dignity respected, which is diminished when life loses meaning through futile treatment.
The right to security in and control over one's body, including the right to refuse unwanted medical intervention.
Protection from treatment that is cruel, inhuman, or degrading, which can include forced medical procedures.
The foundational right to self-determination, which informs all other rights related to end-of-life decisions.
Following public input, recommended legislation for both living wills and durable powers of attorney for healthcare.
Download Project 86 ReportSection 7 establishes the right to informed consent and refusal of treatment, and provides for appointing a healthcare proxy.
Unambiguously affirmed the right to refuse life-prolonging treatment, allowing natural processes to take their course.
Long-standing recognition of bodily integrity and that medical treatment without consent constitutes an assault.
Explicitly require practitioners to respect patient autonomy in refusing treatment and support the use of advance directives.
Download GuidelinesRecognises that living wills reflect a patient's wishes and should be respected, advising medical guidance in their drafting.
The Association of Palliative Care Practitioners provides toolkits for patients and doctors to facilitate compassionate end-of-life conversations.
Visit PALPRAC WebsiteA professional consensus that withholding or withdrawing futile life-sustaining treatment is not only permissible but mandatory.
Leading organisations backing advance directive legislation in South Africa
It's crucial to understand that advance directives enable natural deaths by allowing nature to take its course, not assisted dying which involves administering means that cause death.
Withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment to allow the natural disease process to continue
No administration of substances or means that directly cause death
Allowing natural biological processes and disease progression without artificial prolongation
“A competent person's right to refuse medical treatment, even if it results in death, is a well-established principle in our law.”
Administering a lethal substance or means to intentionally and prematurely end life
The explicit purpose is to cause death, rather than allowing natural processes to unfold
Palliative care aims to manage symptoms and improve quality of life, not hasten death
“This campaign does not support assisted dying or euthanasia, which are separate issues with their own distinct legal and ethical considerations.”
Add your organisation to our list of supporters, or send us a message to find out how you can get involved.